Tajima LLP has been recognized in the Chambers USA California Spotlight Guide 2026, highlighting the firm as a leading business litigation boutique and a credible alternative to Big Law for complex commercial disputes.
Pure hourly billing and pure contingency fees each have limitations in complex commercial disputes. A hybrid fee structure — reduced hourly rates combined with a success-based component — can better align attorney and client incentives while preserving aggressive, trial-ready representation.
The Supreme Court’s April 2026 argument asks whether FIFRA preempts state failure-to-warn claims where the EPA has not required the warning — a decision that will define the boundary between federal regulatory approval and state tort law.
When a customer stops paying invoices or a counterparty defaults on a settlement agreement, California businesses need to act fast. A practical guide to CCP § 664.6 enforcement, pre-judgment attachment, goods vs. services distinctions, and payment under protest.
California's Unfair Competition Law offers powerful equitable remedies alongside trade secret claims — but defendants can move to dismiss them as preempted by CUTSA. Strategic guidance for plaintiffs and defendants from Tajima LLP.
When Asia-Pacific business interests collide with California law, having the right California counsel is the difference between a swift resolution and a prolonged fight across continents. Tajima LLP explains how a Los Angeles boutique delivers results.
A review of public California demurrer rulings addressing CUTSA preemption, overlapping business tort claims, and computer-access allegations in trade secret litigation. Tajima LLP secured multiple demurrer victories in Los Angeles Superior Court.
The Central District of California's local rules and judge-specific standing orders contain requirements that routinely catch experienced out-of-state litigators off guard. A practical guide to avoiding procedural pitfalls.
Serving a defendant abroad is one of the few areas of litigation where a procedural misstep can invalidate an otherwise strong case. A practical guide to navigating international service.
California CCP Section 2016.090 allows parties to demand early initial disclosures. Despite its potential to reshape litigation, it remains significantly underutilized.
Jackie Levien has been elevated to Partner at Tajima LLP, effective April 1, 2026. Jackie has been an integral part of the firm since its inception, bringing experience from Latham & Watkins LLP.
Tajima LLP, formerly known as Trepanier Tajima LLP, continues to operate under its new name as a boutique complex business litigation firm based in Los Angeles. Same mission, same commitment, same results.
White & Case highlighted the RTI / Matulich arbitration — in which Chase Tajima served as lead counsel — in its global analysis of data center and digital infrastructure disputes.
Tajima LLP represented RTI Cable in the successful transfer of three major trans-Pacific submarine cable systems — JGA North, JGA South, and SEA-US — to Lightstorm in a landmark international telecommunications deal.
Operating without proper licensing in California can lead to severe penalties, fines, and even criminal charges. Learn about the most common contractor licensing pitfalls and how to protect your business.
A professional reputation takes years to build and only seconds to dismantle with a well-placed lie. To win a commercial defamation case in California, a business must bridge the gap between a defamatory remark and a specific, quantifiable financial loss.
In California's commercial environment, mid-sized enterprises often face disputes that can threaten their operational stability. Litigation demands a precise approach rather than a reactive one — here is how to think strategically from day one.
Tajima LLP now incorporates Westlaw Precision with Generative AI — one of the most advanced legal research tools available — to deliver faster, sharper, and more comprehensive legal analysis for our clients.
When facing a legal dispute, many clients instinctively search for a narrow specialist. But what truly drives success in complex litigation is strategic thinking, adaptability, and the ability to see the full battlefield — not just one corner of it.
When a defendant is served with a civil lawsuit in California Superior Court, they must respond within a prescribed timeframe. The defendant has several procedural mechanisms at their disposal — each tailored to specific circumstances and strategic goals.
Businesses, corporate executives, property owners, and high-net-worth individuals are all susceptible to civil litigation. When served, the first steps you take can define the outcome of your entire case.